Real estate agent · Woburn
Robert Smith
Churchill Properties
The local track record
Robert Smith ranks #6 by asking volume and #10 (tied) by homes listed in Woburn, among 288 agents and teams, with 4 homes listed and $5.4M in asking volume. Median listing price in Woburn: NA. Figures cover Nov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026.
Published geographic standings
Where this agent stands out
Citywide totals include qualifying neighborhood homes. Each geography has its own ranking; these rows are not added together.
| Area / reporting period | Homes listed | Listing rank | Asking volume | Volume rank | Median listing price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woburn ↗Boston · CitywideNov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026 | 4 | T-10of 288 | $5.4M | #6 | NA4 priced homes |
| Lexington ↗Boston · CitywideNov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026 | 4 | T-20of 205 | $11.8M | #17 | NA4 priced homes |
Asking prices, not completed sales. Median listing price requires at least 5 priced homes and 90% price coverage; otherwise NA.
Answers from the data
About Robert Smith’s listing activity
Where is Robert Smith most active?
Among the published areas shown for Nov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026, Robert Smith has the most credited homes in Lexington: 4. Citywide counts include qualifying neighborhood homes; geographic areas may overlap and are not added together.
View source and methodology ↗Where does Robert Smith rank highest?
Robert Smith ranks #6 by asking volume and #10 (tied) by homes listed in Woburn, among 288 agents and teams, with 4 homes listed and $5.4M in asking volume. Median listing price in Woburn: NA. Figures cover Nov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026.
View source and methodology ↗How does Robert Smith rank in Woburn?
Robert Smith ranks #6 by asking volume and #10 (tied) by homes listed in Woburn, with 4 homes listed and $5.4M in asking volume from Nov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026.
View source and methodology ↗What is Robert Smith’s median listing price in Woburn?
NA. A median listing price needs at least five priced homes and prices for at least 90% of the credited homes in Woburn from Nov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026.
View source and methodology ↗How do citywide and neighborhood rankings relate?
Each area has its own ranking. A citywide count includes the agent’s qualifying homes inside that city, including its neighborhoods. Do not add neighborhood counts to the city total. A city boundary is different from the wider metropolitan area. These figures measure observed listing activity, not completed sales or service quality. Coverage is not complete MLS coverage.
View source and methodology ↗Loading current property availability…
How the listing data works
Scope & sources
What these figures tell you
Cribber measures observed listing representation using published geographic standings. Homes listed are distinct eligible properties credited to this agent or team; co-listed properties credit each named agent.
Asking volume uses listing asking prices and does not represent completed sales. Rankings do not measure service quality, buyer representation or negotiation outcomes. Coverage is not complete MLS coverage.
Keep the periods separate
Ranking dates appear with each area. Current property availability is separate from the published ranking. Historical samples, where available, carry their own dates and are not a complete career record.
Read the ranking methodology ↗Explore Woburn’s leaderboard ↗